Wednesday, June 07, 2006

AA Turbo Charger works with any cell phone

AA Turbo Charger, Inc. Opens Its First Regional Distribution Center in
Dallas, Texas

(PRLEAP.COM) The First Regional Distribution Center with a 20,000 unit
Inventory for the AA Turbo Portable Cell Phone Charger will be available in June
2006 in the Dallas Fort Worth Metroplex Area. The new Regional Distribution
Center owners; one of which is an Attorney, flew in and met with the owners of
AA Turbo Charger Marketing (aaTCM) and in just a few hours deposited $300,000
for the 20,000 unit inventory and locked up The JVP for 90 Days.

According to Norman Doeteroff, the inventor of the Turbo Charge, the idea to
create this product came to him after he lost his cell phone charge while
traveling. In an attempt to use a competitor’s product, Mr. Doeteroff became
extremely frustration as the competitor’s product only held a single charge.

The AA Turbo Charge is a lip stick size portable cell phone charger that uses a
double A battery and gives you an additional 2 hours of talk time. Additional
adapters are provided for about 95% of cell phone models.

Currently, additional Regional Distribution Centers are needed in the following

United States

NC, OH, OK, PA, PR, SC, TN, TX, UT, VA, WA, WI and WY


Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, Malaysia, India, Saudi Arabia,
Indonesia, Philippines, Korea, Turkey, Spain, Italy, France, Ireland, UK,
Portugal, Switzerland, Greece, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Russia,
Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, Peru, Bolivia, Chile, Argentina,
Caribbean and South Africa.

AA Turbo Charger Marketing, Inc. is currently offering a $5,000 reward to anyone
who can secure a joint venture partner in the United States and a $50,000 reward
for anyone who is able to secure a joint venture partner for aa-TCM Inc

According to spokesperson for AA Turbo Charger, Inc., sales for the AA Turbo
Charger reached $800,000 in 10 days and are expected to double in the next 2

An additional 20,000 representatives will be needed to handle the increase in
demand for this product.

For more information on the AA Turbo Charger and/or the joint venture please
or email

Thursday, May 25, 2006


IRVINE, CA, May 24, 2006 -- Oxford Media, Inc. (OTC BB: OXMI.OB - News), a secure digital communication and technology company, announced today it has signed an agreement with the Grand Canyon Squire Inn (Grand Canyon, Arizona) through one of its Platinum Dealers, AZ Digital Dish Inc. for digital Video-on-Demand and Pay-Per-View entertainment to its 250 rooms. Installation is scheduled to be completed in June 2006.

“We have been searching for a solution for our hotel properties since 1999, and until now, there wasn’t such an offering, much less an affordable one. We are excited to move forward in helping our customers enhance their guests’ experience”, said, Brian Brimhall, President, AZ Digital Dish Inc. (

“Our technology was built to support hotels ranging from small to large. While our target market is the smaller underserved hotels, this is an example of how we are priced to compete in larger hotels offering more revenue and profits than our competitors”, said Rick Shafer, EVP of Sales of Oxford Media, Inc.

As part of the Agreement, Oxford Media was granted "rooftop rights" to install a WiMAX antenna or similar transmitting/receiving device on the rooftop of the Grand Canyon Squire Inn. The sole consideration to be paid by Oxford Media for these rooftop rights will be a percentage of future revenue derived from the antenna, which is to be negotiated.

About Oxford Media, Inc.

Oxford Media is a leading developer of digital VOD and PPV entertainment systems that are scalable and turnkey offering hotel guests a variety of video content on-demand including the latest first-run Hollywood Movies, while giving a ROI to property owners. Oxford Media’s market is comprised of small and mid-sized hotels and motels -- a segment of the hotel industry previously underserved and unable to offer such services to their guests. This targeted market of hotel properties between 50 to 300 rooms, comprises over 2.4 million hotel rooms in the U.S. and represents approximately 56% of the total hotel market.

Oxford's wholly owned subsidiary Creative Business Concepts, Inc. is a wireless and business systems provider specializing in WiFi/WiMAX, IT Security and IT Integration, and Telecom. As part of these service offerings, CBC designs and installs specialty communication systems for data, voice, video, and telecom.

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Arizona CPS prove to be Satanic

Anyone following this story knows for a fact that Hugh Bodiger worships Satan. However, in all honesty, it must be pointed out that Hugh Bodiger agrees that Floyd Humpherys is a wonderful parent and that CPS is totally at fault, although his supervisors have stated that if Donna returns to her loving home, that the CPS will use all Satanic means to disrupt the family unit! This is a paraphrase and not necessarily verbatim. The one thing that is absolutely certain is that since Floyd has never did anything wrong, and if the devil worshipers say he has, then perhaps they should make those things public. I am going to write a book entitled "How to win CPS everytime guaranteed". In all cases 100% of the time CPS is sponsored by and works for Satan. Anyone saying otherwise is simply a dumb ass. You will be able to follow this blog and get the book for free. As readership grows, and it is, readers are seeing the reality that CPS has always been of Satan. Is anybody stupid enough to think that Jesus would hire hundreds of thousands of thugs to remove children from loving parents? CPS workers operate outside the law in that as Hugh Bodiger said his self "I don't need a warrant if I have a trumped up complaint". One of the reasons that Satan is so strong in Apache County is that there are so many God loving people to balance the scale of the Satanic CPS. It simply is not possible for an organization that is not run by Satan, to systematically target God loving families for what CPS calls God Cleansing. This is why God was taken out of the school. In all cases 100% of the time CPS worships Satan. Anyone saying otherwise is simply stupid. That is what they do for a living. No CPS worker in it's history has ever helped a child. Anyone that says otherwise is lieing.

Saturday, April 08, 2006

Proof of Satanic Worship

God made man and beast and fish on the same day.  That proves the fish didn’t swim to shore and grow legs and become a monkey and then a man. It says so right in the Old Testament.  And in another testament:  

  1. 1 Ne. 13: 6
(image placeholder) 6 And it came to pass that I beheld this agreat• and babominable church; and I saw the cdevil• that he was the founder of it.(image placeholder)
This means that the Great and abominable Church consists of millions of people that say they worship God, when in fact they worship Satan.  One of the many things that prove they are of the Devil is that they baptize babies that of course can have no sin.  Anyone that believes newborn children have sinned is a stupid ass.    

The battle between good and evil started before the Garden of Eden and in fact before it was decided that we would follow Jesus.  Satan at this time began to plan to break up families in order to thwart the Lord’s Plan of Salvation.  

Some of the most notable accomplishments of Satan are the legalization of killing unborn children in cold blood, implementing the Child Protective Service to operate outside the law for the sole purpose of kidnapping predominantly white children in order to break up the family unit (Anyone that says otherwise is a devil worshiping liar); keep in mind that CPS rarely takes babies from drug addicted parents as they are not as in demand in the adoption market and in fact, the only children that need CPS are dead;  CPS claims that they are trying to prevent death or abuse, but this is an absolute lie and anyone saying otherwise is a full blown Satan worshiper, and don’t forget taking God out of school and forcing homosexuals in.  

Now while all CPS workers do not worship Satan at the local Catholic Church, (Hugh Bodiger of the Saint Johns, Arizona Chapter of the Devil Worshiping CPS is a Mormon for example), it must be said that Hugh Bodiger is not an active attending member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and in fact is not worthy to attend the House of the Lord.

Pretty soon citizens will simply kill the CPS workers along with illegal aliens and Jesus will come back and restore all children that were taken by CPS back to their loving parents.  

It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a CPS employee to enter the Kingdom of God.    


Thursday, April 06, 2006

Theodore Roosevelt's ideas on Immigrants and being an AMERICAN in 1907

"In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin. But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American.There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language.. And we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

Theodore Roosevelt 1907

Of course, we could solve the entire illigal immigration problem in one day. Simply put a bounty of $100 cash on each alien and citizens can bring which ever body part as required by law to the local Police station where the citizen would be paid in cash with no questions asked whatsoever. Since there are 12 million aliens, at $100 each, we can determine the cost of extinction to the penny. The cash incentives would stimulate the economy and there would be 12 million new jobs in one day. We could grind up the dead carcasses and make dog food and donate all the proceeds to help the homeless. Then there would be zero homeless and unemployment would be zero percent.

Sunday, March 26, 2006

The difference between a Christian and a Devil Worshiper

"13. We believe in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous, and in doing good to all men; indeed, we may say that we follow the admonition of Paul—-We believe all things, we hope all things, we have endured many things, and hope to be able to endure all things. If there is anything virtuous, lovely, or of good report or praiseworthy, we seek after these things."

13th Article of Faith

This is what many Christians believe to be Christ-Like. When Devil Worshipers go to Church, it doesn't matter the denomination. They could be Mormon, Catholic, Baptist, Scientology, or self proclaimed devil worshipers. Just like all Muslims are not terrorists, devil worshipers are not all Christian. So one clue to finding a person that wants to break up families would be if they do it for a living. They chose that profession knowing full well that no CPS worker has ever saved a child. If a child is ever really found to be abused, there are many people to do what is right and there never is a legitimate reason for CPS to exist. Let alone that they operate outside the law and in secrecy. A Devil Worshiper then is someone that does on purpose acts which defy Christ. A Judas may profess to love Christ, but if he/she purposefully removes children from loving parents, then it is obvious that all CPS workers not only worship Satan, but they do so knowingly and on purpose in order to help the Adversary obtain souls that would otherwise live in Eternity with Jesus and God.

Tuesday, March 21, 2006

Marilyn at CPS pays tribute to Satan in public

Well, it seems after a fact meeting with the Arizona CPS, that Marilyn expresses her opinion that a person may one day make a mistake or otherwise be less than perfect as the Savior was.  She believes that children should be taken from their parents, just in case.  I personally believe that she hates the Savior and enjoys breaking up families.  

Saturday, March 11, 2006

Democrats and CPS

Subject: How the Family System Really WorksAdoption Bonuses: The Money Behind the MadnessNo Happy Ending for These ChildrenDSS and Affiliates Rewarded for Breaking Up Families
by Nev Moore Massachusetts News
Child "protection" is one of the biggest businesses in the country. We spend $12 billion a year on it. The money goes to tens of thousands of a) state employees, b) collateral professionals, such as lawyers, court personnel, court investigators, evaluators and guardians, judges, and c) DSS contracted vendors such as counselors, therapists, more "evaluators", junk psychologists, residential facilities, foster parents, adoptive parents, MSPCC, Big Brothers/Big Sisters, YMCA, etc. This newspaper is not big enough to list all of the people in this state who have a job, draw a paycheck, or make their profits off the kids in DSS custody.
In this article I explain the financial infrastructure that provides the motivation for DSS to take people's children - and not give them back. In 1974 Walter Mondale promoted the Child Abuse and Prevention Act which began feeding massive amounts of federal funding to states to set up programs to combat child abuse and neglect. From that came Child "Protective" Services, as we know it today. After the bill passed, Mondale himself expressed concerns that it could be misused. He worried that it could lead states to create a "business" in dealing with children.
Then in 1997 President Clinton passed the Adoption and Safe Families Act. The public relations campaign promoted it as a way to help abused and neglected children who languished in foster care for years, often being shuffled among dozens of foster homes, never having a real home and family.
In a press release from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services dated November 24, 1999, it refers to "President Clinton's initiative to double by 2002 the number of children in foster care who are adopted or otherwise permanently placed." It all sounded so heartwarming. We, the American public, are so easily led. We love to buy stereotypes; we just eat them up, no questions asked. But, my mother, bless her heart, taught me from the time I was young to "consider the source."
In the stereotype that we've been sold about kids in foster care, we picture a forlorn, hollow-eyed child, thin and pale, looking up at us beseechingly through a dirt streaked face. Unconsciously, we pull up old pictures from Life magazine of children in Appalachia in the 1930s. We think of orphans and children abandoned by parents who look like Manson family members. We play a nostalgic movie in our heads of the little fellow shyly walking across an emerald green, manicured lawn to meet Ward and June Cleaver, his new adoptive parents, who lead him into their lovely suburban home. We imagine the little tike's eyes growing as big as saucers as the Cleavers show him his very own room, full of toys and sports gear. And we just feel so gosh darn good about ourselves.
Now it's time to wake up to the reality of the adoption business. Very few children who are being used to supply the adoption market are hollow-eyed tikes from Appalachia. Very few are crack babies from the projects. [Oh. you thought those were the children they were saving? Think again]. When you are marketing a product you have to provide a desirable product that sells. In the adoption business that would be nice kids with reasonably good genetics who clean up good. An interesting point is that the Cape Cod & Islands office leads the state in terms of processing kids into the system and having them adopted out. More than the inner city areas, the projects, Mission Hill, Brockton, Lynn, etc. Interesting.
With the implementation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act, President Clinton tried to make himself look like a humanitarian who is responsible for saving the abused and neglected children. The drive of this initiative is to offer cash bonuses to states for every child they have adopted out of foster care, with the goal of doubling their adoptions by 2002, and sustaining that for each subsequent year. They actually call them adoption incentive bonuses, to promote the adoption of children.
Where to Find the Children
A whole new industry was put into motion. A sweet marketing scheme that even Bill Gates could envy. Now, if you have a basket of apples, and people start giving you $100 per apple, what are you going to do? Make sure that you have an unlimited supply of apples, right? The United States Department of Health & Human Services administers Child Protective Services. To accompany the ASF Act, the President requested, by executive memorandum, an initiative entitled Adoption 2002, to be implemented and managed by Health & Human Services. The initiative not only gives the cash adoption bonuses to the states, it also provides cash adoption subsidies to adoptive parents until the children turn eighteen. Everybody makes money. If anyone really believes that these people are doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, then I've got some bad news for you.
The fact that this program is run by HHS, ordered from the very top, explains why the citizens who are victims of DSS get no response from their legislators. It explains why no one in the Administration cares about the abuse and fatalities of children in the "care" of DSS, and no one wants to hear about the broken arms, verbal abuse, or rapes. They are just business casualties. It explains why the legislators I've talked to for the past three years look at me with pity. Because I'm preaching to the already damned.
The legislators have forgotten who funds their paychecks and who they need to account to, as has the Governor. Because it isn't the President. It's us.
How DSS Is Helped
The way that the adoption bonuses work is that each state is given a baseline number of expected adoptions based on population. For every child that DSS can get adopted, there is a bonus of $4,000 to $6,000. But that is just the starting figure in a complex mathematical formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the state has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number. The states must maintain this increase in each successive year. [Like compound interest.] The bill reads: "$4,000 to $6,000 will be multiplied by the amount (if any) by which the number of foster child adoptions in the State exceeds the base number of foster child adoptions for the State for the fiscal year."
In the "technical assistance" section of the bill it states that, "the Secretary [of HHS] may, directly or through grants or contracts, provide technical assistance to assist states and local communities to reach their targets for increased numbers of adoptions for children in foster care." The technical assistance is to support "the goal of encouraging more adoptions out of the foster care system; the development of best practice guidelines for expediting the termination of parental rights; the development of special units and expertise in moving children toward adoption as a permanent goal; models to encourage the fast tracking of children who have not attained 1 year of age into pre-adoptive placements; and the development of programs that place children into pre-adoptive placements without waiting for termination of parental rights."
In the November press release from HHS it continues, "HHS awarded the first ever adoption bonuses to States for increases in the adoption of children from the public foster care system." Some of the other incentives offered are "innovative grants" to reduce barriers to adoption [i.e., parents], more State support for adoptive families, making adoption affordable for families by providing cash subsides and tax credits.
A report from a private think tank, the National Center for Policy Analysis, reads: "The way the federal government reimburses States rewards a growth in the size of the program instead of the effective care of children." Another incentive being promoted is the use of the internet to make adoption easier. Clinton directed HHS to develop an Internet site to "link children in foster care with adoptive families." So we will be able to window shop for children on a government website. If you don't find anything you like there, you can surf on over to the "Adopt Shoppe." If you prefer to actually be able to kick tires instead of just looking at pictures you could attend one of DSS's quaint "Adoption Fairs," where live children are put on display and you can walk around and browse. Like a flea market to sell kids. If one of them begs you to take him home you can always say, "Sorry. Just looking."
The incentives for government child snatching are so good that I'm surprised we don't have government agents breaking down people's doors and just shooting the parents in the heads and grabbing the kids. But then, if you need more apples you don't chop down your apple trees.
Benefits for Foster Parents
That covers the goodies the State gets. Now let's have a look at how the Cleavers make out financially after the adoption is finalized. After the adoption is finalized, the State and federal subsidies continue. The adoptive parents may collect cash subsidies until the child is 18. If the child stays in school, subsidies continue to the age of 22. There are State funded subsidies as well as federal funds through the Title IV-E section of the Social Security Act. The daily rate for State funds is the same as the foster care payments, which range from $410-$486 per month per child. Unless the child can be designated "special needs," which of course, they all can.
According to the NAATRIN State Subsidy profile from DSS, "special needs" may be defined as: "Physical disability, mental disability, emotional disturbance; a significant emotional tie with the foster parents where the child has resided with the foster parents for one or more years and separation would adversely affect the child's development if not adopted by them." [But their significant emotional ties with their parents, since birth, never enter the equation.]
Additional "special needs" designations are: a children twelve years of age or older; racial or ethnic factors; child having siblings or half-siblings. In their report on the State of the Children, Boston's Institute for Children says: "In part because the States can garner extra federal funds for special needs children the designation has been broadened so far as to become meaningless." "Special needs" children may also get an additional Social Security check.
The adoptive parents also receive Medicaid for the child, a clothing allowance and reimbursement for adoption costs such as adoption fees, court and attorney fees, cost of adoption home study, and "reasonable costs of food and lodging for the child and adoptive parents when necessary to complete the adoption process." Under Title XX of the Social Security Act adoptive parents are also entitled to post adoption services "that may be helpful in keeping the family intact," including "daycare, specialized daycare, respite care, in-house support services such as housekeeping, and personal care, counseling, and other child welfare services". [Wow! Everything short of being knighted by the Queen!] The subsidy profile actually states that it does not include money to remodel the home to accommodate the child. But, as subsidies can be negotiated, remodeling could possibly be accomplished under the "innovative incentives to remove barriers to adoption" section.
The subsidy regulations read that "adoption assistance is based solely on the needs of the child without regard to the income of the family." What an interesting government policy when compared to the welfare program that the same child's mother may have been on before losing her children, and in which she may not own anything, must prove that she has no money in the bank; no boats, real estate, stocks or bonds; and cannot even own a car that is safe to drive worth over $1000. This is all so she can collect $539 per month for herself and two children. The foster parent who gets her children gets $820 plus. We spit on the mother on welfare as a parasite who is bleeding the taxpayers, yet we hold the foster and adoptive parents [who are bleeding ten times as much from the taxpayers] up as saints. The adoptive and foster parents aren't subjected to psychological evaluations, ink blot tests, MMPI's, drug & alcohol evaluations, or urine screens as the parents are.
Adoption subsidies may be negotiated on a case by case basis. [Anyone ever tried to "negotiate" with the Welfare Department?] There are many e-mail lists and books published to teach adoptive parents how to negotiate to maximize their subsidies. As one pro writes on an e-mail list: "We receive a subsidy for our kids of $1,900 per month plus another $500 from the State of Florida. We are trying to adopt three more teens and we will get subsidies for them, too. It sure helps out with the bills."
I can't help but wonder why we don't give this same level of support to the children's parents in the first place? According to Cornell University, about 68% of all child protective cases "do not involve child maltreatment." The largest percentage of CPS/DSS cases are for "deprivation of necessities" due to poverty. So, if the natural parents were given the incredible incentives and services listed above that are provided to the adoptive parents, wouldn't it stand to reason that the causes for removing children in the first place would be eliminated? How many less children would enter foster care in the first place?
The child protective budget would be reduced from $12 billion to around $4 billion. Granted, tens of thousands of social workers, administrators, lawyers, juvenile court personnel, therapists, and foster parents would be out of business, but we would have safe, healthy, intact families, which are the foundation of any society.
That's just a fantasy, of course. The reality is that maybe we will see Kathleen Crowley's children on the government home-shopping-for-children web site and some one out there can buy them.
May is national adoption month. To support "Adoption 2002," the U.S. Postal Service is issuing special adoption stamps. Let us hope they don't feature pictures of kids who are for sale. I urge everyone to boycott these stamps and register complaints with the post office. I know that I'm feeling pretty smug and superior about being part of such a socially advanced and compassionate society. How about you?
These cases are NOT aberrations, and they are NOT due to incompetence. They are about a well orchestrated corrupt enterprise; the trafficking of children for profit. We have all the evidence necessary to prove this. We only need to find someone intelligent enough to understand the scheme and honest enough to do something about it. In the meantime, we continue to expose everything we can, pull the covers off those who are hiding under the blankets of "confidentiality," and the invisible armor that covers black robes.
Story set by Joe Neufeld -

Thursday, March 09, 2006

I asked her Donna whPublic not allowed in CPS kidnappings

I asked her (Donna) why the meetings were secret and why the media were not allowed to be present when CPS workers hold a "Fact" meeting. 
When a secret government agency operates above the law and does not use Court Orders or Warrants and reports only to Satan as said to Floyd Humpherys by Hugh Bodiger, although Hugh did say, and I quote him exactly as he said it to my face which was about 18 inches from his face "There is a middle man".   I took that to mean that he does not deal with the ultimate devil first hand, but that he is ordered to by his superiors. 
CPS did not have a Warrant or Court Order or authority of any kind other than two deputy sheriffs with guns. 

It wasn't until Donna talked with the attorney on the phone that she realized that the CPS had in fact violated the law and was run amuck with corruption.  Well, actually we had both talked with several attorneys and are of course willing to talk with more. 

Basically, since the whole kidnapping at gunpoint was illegal in the first place as there were no warrants or Court Orders, and if anyone says that there was they are a liar and also part of the devil worshiping scheme, then Audrey was taken illegally and we know without Court Order or Warrant, and that the CPS office has refused as required by law to allow Floyd the entire case against him, if any, and Audrey should be allowed to stand up and tell the anti-Christ CPS workers that she wants to be with the most kind and wonderful Floyd and asks that the CPS publish a full page notice in all papers that serve Witch Well that they are sorry and want to pay Audrey twelve million dollars for the suffering that they did willfully and with premeditation inflict upon her.   
Oh, and because they operate in secret, I think that all of their meetings should be made public!


Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Buy Guns Wholesale in Springerville, AZ

Did you know that you can buy guns wholesale and have them delivered to your favorite gun store at a savings of up to 50% less than you would pay for the very same gun at the very same gun store?
For instance, the gun store at Western Drug in Springerville, AZ charges $129.95 for a 9mm pistol that costs only $99 if you order it delivered to the drug store by clicking here.
Witch Well Energy, Hostiam Communications Network, Survival Dealer, and Witch Well Web have combined their efforts to bring you the lowest prices on the highest quality guns in the world!
Simply click on the link in the previous line and start saving on scopes, ammo, rifles, pistols, silencers, targets, etc.  
Remember, it is 100% legal to kill people that claim to be CPS workers, but have no warrants or Court Orders if they try to kidnap your child.  If a dirty cop is with them and cannot or will not provide a valid Court Order, or Warrant to remove the child, it is legal to kill them also.